Born: Albert Darer,
artist, 1471, Nuremberg; Elijah Fenton, poet, 1683,
Shelton, Staffordshire.
Died: Christopher
Columbus, 1506, Valladolid; Bishop Thomas Sprat, 1713,
Bromley, Kent; Nicholas Brady, D. D., joint translator
of the Psalms into English, 1726, Clapham; Thomas
Boston, popular Scotch writer in divinity, 1732,
Ettrick; Charles Bonnet, naturalist, 1793, Geneva;
Rev. Blanco White, miscellaneous writer, 1841.
Feast Day: St.
Ethelbert, king of the East Angles, 793; B. Yvo,
Bishop of Chartres, 1115. St. Bernardine of Sienna.
BLANCO WHITE
There is, perhaps, no more
remarkable and affecting story of the conflict and
suffering endured by an earnest and honest mind in
search for religious truth, than that afforded by the
life of the Rev. Joseph Blanco White.
He was born at Seville, in
1775. His father belonged to an Irish family, and his
mother was a Spaniard, connected with the old
Andalusian nobility. His father was engaged in trade,
and Blanco was placed in the counting-house, that he
might at once learn writing and arithmetic, and become
fitted for business. The drudgery he abhorred; his
mother sympathized with him, and as a way of escape it
was resolved that he should announce the church as his
vocation. His father unwillingly assented. He was sent
to college, became a priest, and attained sundry
preferments. From an early age he had been afflicted
with doubts. In reading Fenelon's Telemaque, before he
was full eight years old, his delight in the story and
sympathy with the courage and virtue of the
characters, suggested the question, 'Why should we
feel so perfectly sure that those who worshipped in
that manner were wrong?'
As a priest, graver doubts
thickened in his mind, until at last he found himself
'worked to the madness of utter atheism.' He found
other priests in the same case, but they were
satisfied to perform their offices as matters of
business or routine. This was impossible for White,
and he longed to escape to some land where he should
be free to speak openly all that he thought inwardly.
In the excitement of the French invasion he sailed for
England, and arrived in London in 1810. There he was
fortunate enough to project and edit a monthly
magazine, El Espan�l, for circulation in Spain. It met
the favour of the English government, and when
discontinued in 1814, with the expulsion of the French
from the Peninsula, White was rewarded with a pension
of �250 a-year. The five years of hard work he passed
through in the preparation of El Espan�l ruined his
health to such a degree, that his life was never
afterwards free from suffering.
After his arrival in England
he reviewed his opinions free from the antagonism and
irritation he had endured in Spain, and which, he
writes, had for ten years rendered the very name of
religion so odious to me, that no language was strong
enough to express my dislike.' After two years of
serious consideration, in which he discovered 'that,
with the exception of points essentially Popish, there
is the most perfect agreement in the theological
systems of Rome and England,' he became a member of
the Church of England, and then a clergyman, by
signing the twenty-four Articles, being all that is
required to transform a Roman into an Anglican priest.
His life hence-forward for many years was spent in
literary pursuits; he wrote some very popular works
illustrative of his experience and opinions of
Catholicism; and enjoyed the friendship of Lord
Holland, Southey, Coleridge,
Campbell, Mrs. Hemans,
and, above all, of Archbishop Whately. The peace he
had at first enjoyed in the Church of England began to
ebb away, and in 1818 difficulties about the Trinity
were haunting him continually.
After a long and weary time of
internal strife, the crisis arrived in December 1834,
when residing at the archbishop's palace in Dublin. To
Dr. Whately he wrote, 'My views in regard to the
Scripture doctrine respecting our Saviour have
gradually become Unitarian. The struggles which my
mind has gone through on this point are
indescribable.' The pain which this confession excited
among his friends in the Church was intense. The Rev.
J. H. Newman wrote him a letter from Oxford, which he
describes as 'one long moan.' Many turned away from
him, but Archbishop Whately, while regretting the
change, preserved his friendship unaltered. To enjoy
the worship and fellowship of the Unitarians, he
settled in Liverpool, and there spent the remaining
six years of his life. His health was wretched, but
his days of pain were soothed by intercourse with
congenial society, and correspondence with Dr.
Charming and other notable men in the Unitarian body.
Worn with suffering, he obtained release in death, on
the 20th of May 1841. On the morning of that day he
woke, and said, 'Now I die;' and after sitting for
about two hours in the attitude of expectation, it
came to pass as he had said.
Blanco White was the author of
a sonnet on Night,' which has been thought by many
the
best composition of the kind in our language; as it is
not much known, it is here inserted.
Mysterious night! when our
first parent knew
Thee from report Divine, and heard thy name,
Did he not tremble for this lovely frame,
This glorious canopy of light and blue?
Yet 'neath a curtain of translucent dew,
Bathed in the rays of the great setting flame,
Hesperus with the host of heaven came,
And lo! Creation widened in man's view.
Who could have thought such darkness lay concealed
Within thy beams, 0 Sun! or who could find,
Whilst fly, and leaf, and insect stood revealed,
That to such countless orbs thou mildest us blind!
Why do we then shun death with anxious strife?
If Light can thus deceive, wherefore not Life?
THE GARRAT ELECTIONS
A comparatively obscure act of
local injustice originated during the last century a
political burlesque, which was so highly relished by
the British public, that sometimes upwards of 80,000
persons assembled to take part in or enjoy the fan.
The inhabitants of the hamlet of Garrat, situated
between Wandsworth and Tooting, in Surrey, had certain
rights in a small common, which had been encroached
upon; they therefore met in conclave, elected a
president, resisted, and obtained their rights. As
this happened at the time of a general election, it
was determined that their president, or mayor, should
hold office during parliament, and be re-elected with
a new one. It was impossible that the ridiculous
pomposity of the whole affair should not be felt and
joked upon. When, therefore, party-spirit ran high,
its effervescence was parodied by 'the storm in a
tea-pot' of a Garrat election.
The public soon began
to enjoy the joke, and the inn-keepers and publicans
of Wandsworth and the neighbourhood reaped so rich a
harvest, that they ultimately made up a purse to pay
necessary expenses; the queerest and most facetious of
candidates were brought from all quarters; and all
the paraphernalia of a serious election were parodied
in this mock one. The culminating point of its
popularity was reached in 1761, when
Foote attended,
and soon afterwards produced his farce, Die Mayor of Garrat, at the Haymarket
Theatre, where it had a great
and deserved success, and immortalized elections that
else would have been long since forgotten.
We possess no information as
to who were the candidates for this important borough
before 1747, when Squire Blowmedown and Squire Gubbins
contested the honour. These were, as usual, assumed
titles�the first being borne by John Willis, a
waterman of Wandsworth; the second by
James Simmonds,
keeper of a public-house known as the 'Gubbins' Head,'
in Blackman Street, Borough. 'The Clerk and Recorder'
issued from an imaginary town-hall, at the order of
the mayor, a due notification of the day of election;
and each candidate gave out handbills, in which he
asserted his own merits, and abused his opponent in
the style of the genuine elections. An 'Oath of
Qualification 'was administered to electors, which was
couched throughout in a strain of double entendre, and
nothing was left undone that was usually done to
insure success to the candidates.
From a somewhat large and
curious collection of handbills and broadsides,
printed during these elections, we may be enabled to
give an idea of the wit of the day. In 1747 the
pretensions of Squire Blowmedown were enforced in 'a
letter sent from an elector of the borough of Garrat
to another,' and dated from St. James's Market, in
which we are assured that 'the greatest stranger must
look upon himself as void of reason, entirely barren
of wisdom, extinct of humanity, and unworthy the
esteem of men of sense and veracity, should he neglect
any opportunity to testify how ardent his wishes are
that this Phaenix may be unanimously chosen.' For, 'as
our worthy candidate judiciously observes, if drinking
largely, heading a mob majestically, huzzaing
eloquently, and feeding voraciously, be merits in any
degree worthy the esteem of the good people of this
land, a Garrat, I must ingeniously confess, is too
mean an apartment for such a worthy; for Envy herself
must confess, if the above qualifications are of any
efficacy, the universal voice of the whole realm of
Great Britain would not be equivalent to his wondrous
deserts.'
In 1754, the same candidates
came forward again, and, in imitation of their
betters, bespattered each other in handbills. Thus
Gubbins, while declaring himself 'zealously affected
to his present Majesty King George, the Church and
State,' asks�'where was Esquire Blowmedown when the
Jew Bill, Matrimony Bill, and Wheel Bill passed?'
Worse still, Blowmedown 'washes his boat every
Sabbath-day, that he may not be induced to rise on
Monday morning before high-water! ' Of course, this
meets with an indignant reply from the friends of the
party attacked, 'a large majority of the most
substantial and wealthy freeholders, electors of the
ancient borough of Garrat' who state themselves to be
not ashamed, much less afraid, to publicly declare
that Blowmedown is the pride and glory of our minds,
and that we will support him to the last.' The bill
ends with an important�'N.B. The Esquire entertains
his friends at all the houses in Wandsworth on the
day of election, which will be elegant and generous,
without any other expense than that of every one
paying for what they call for.'
The election of May 20, 1761,
was alike remarkable for the number of candidates and
for the efficient aid of their friends. Nine
candidates came forward, and it is said that Foote,
Garrick, and Wilkes wrote
some of their addresses.
Foote attended the election, and paid nine guineas for
a room opposite Wandsworth church, for himself and
friends to see the proceedings. The character of
Snuffle, the sexton, in Foote's play, was derived from
John Gardiner, a cobbler of Wandsworth and the
parish
gravedigger, who was one of the candidates under the
name of Lord Twankum. That of Crispin Heeltap was
copied from another candidate, a shoemaker, who came
forward as Lord Lapstone.
The other five were Kit
Noisy, Esq. (one Christopher Beacham, a
waterman),
Lords Wedge and Paxford, Sir John Crambo and Beau
Silvester. The claims of the latter were strongly
enforced in an address to the electors of 'the antient,
loyal, and renowned Boroughwick,' the principal point
of the appeal being the resistance he is reputed to
have made to an extra tax on beer, which at that time
excited much popular ire. A lengthy and high-flown
address was also issued by the Beau, in which he
declares, 'I have given necessary orders for opening
great plenty of public-houses in every hamlet
throughout the electorate, for the reception of my
friends and their acquaintance, desiring at the same
time that they will be punctual in paying for what
they call for; and not to overgorge, as it may
endanger their health, and prejudice my election.' He
then alludes to his fellow-candidates, giving his
highest praise to Lord Lapstone, whose powers of
drinking, he thinks, will produce 'a vast revenue' to
his country, if he be 'spared for a long life! 'We
reprint entire another of his harangues, as it is one
of the host specimens of the Garrat literature:
'To the worthy Electors of
the Antient and Opulent Borough of Garrat.
I return my unfeigned and
hearty thanks to the numberless and worthy electors
that have exerted themselves in my interest, in
support of my election; and should I be so happy (as
by almost a general voice I am already declared) to
be your representative, the honour so conferred will
lay on me such high obligations, as my best
endeavours can never discharge; but my service shall
be always at your command, and my study ever for
your welfare. Without flattery I promise, and
without delay I perform; and, worthy gentlemen, I
doubt not your peculiar penetration, unbiased
integrity, and renowned prudence in the choice of
another,'' worthy of such high honour and important
trust.
In your choice thereof, with submission I
entreat you neither to choose one of fancied high
blood, and certain low fortune, for by him your
privileges will be at stake, either to maintain or advance his honour; nor one
either mean in descent or fortune, as the integrity
of such will be always doubtful; nor yet proud, as
your highest esteem of his merit will serve only for
a footstool to his ambition; nor covetous, for he
will be enamoured with your verdant lawns, and never
rest till he has enclosed your extensive plains in
his parchment noose, and confined your wide-spread
space within the secure bounds of his coffers; nor
impudent, because ignorance will be his only guide
and your sure destruction.
If one too venerable, he
will require more respect from you than ever you
will have service from him; and your remarkable
temperance and sobriety demonstrates your abhorrence
of a beastly glutton and a stupid sot; and common
prudence will direct you to beware of one prompted
by a complication of iniquities, for to his will the
antique charter of your borough, your public
treasure, your private properties, without remorse
will he grasp, and without mercy snatch away your
lives to feed his insatiable cruelty; against either
of these may fate protect your borough and me from
such connexions, but in them the devil will get his
due. As for your humble servant, if my religion is
not the most profound, 'tis the most universally
applauded (20s. to the pound); and I fear not but by
my pious example to increase the practice thereof.
In honour I am upright, and downright in justice;
immovably attached to my king and country, with an
unbiased hatred to their enemies; my manners are
untainted with gaudy politeness or fawning
complaisance. My abilities will procure you the
knowledge of your wants, if not the gratification of
your desires; and those that dare advance the
present price of the darling essence of Sir John
Barley will highly incur my displeasure, if not feel
the weight of my resentment. Through my purer and
universal connexion, your liberty and commerce shall
be spread to the Antipodes, and I will order yet
undiscovered regions to be alarmed with your fame;
in your borough I will erect a non-existent edifice
for the transaction of your timber business, and in
your suburbs plant an imaginary grove for your
private affairs. My unknown fortune shall be ever
ready for your assistance, my useless sword drawn in
your defence; and my waste blood I'll freely spill
in your protection. And, with permission,
'I will, for ever and a day,
Subscribe myself, gentlemen,
Your most obedient servant,
'Bull Hall, May 4th 1761.
'BEAU SILVESTER.'
N. B. �The Election will be
the 20th instant. The Angel at Bull Stairs will be
opened every day for the reception of all friends
that please to honour me with their company.'
It is impossible to read this
address without being forcibly reminded of Matthew
Mug, the principal candidate in Foote's drama. He is a
specious promiser of all good things to Garrat and its
inhabitants, and, like Beau Silvester, particularly
dilates on improving their trade. Should I succeed,
you gentlemen may depend on my using my utmost
endeavours to promote the good of the borough; to
which purpose the encouragement of your trade and
manufactories will most principally tend. Garrat, it
must be owned, is an inland town, and has not, like
Wandsworth, and Fulham, and Putney, the glorious
advantage of a port; but what nature has denied,
industry may supply. Cabbages, carrots, and
cauliflowers may be deemed at present your staple
commodities; but why should not your commerce be
extended? Were I, gentlemen, worthy to advise, I
should recommend the opening a new branch of trade;
sparrowgrass, gentlemen, the manufacturing of
sparrowgrass! Battersea, I own, gentlemen, bears at
present the bell; but where lies the fault? In
ourselves, gentlemen; let us, gentlemen, but exert our
natural strength, and I will take upon me to say, that
a hundred of grass from the corporation of Garrat
will, in a short time, at the London market, be held
at least as an equivalent to a Battersea bundle!'
There can be little doubt that Beau Silvester is 'the
great original' of Matthew Mug.
Kitt Noisy's pretensions are
summed up in a grandiloquent placard, which ends by
confidently prognosticating his success: 'For I am
well assured you know a Demosthenes from a madman, a
Lycurgus from a libertine, and a Mark Anthony from a
mountebank.' All this is sneered down by Sir Humphry
Gubbins, who desires Noisy 'not to make so free with
those capital ancients, Demosthenes, Lycurgus, &c.; as
they are gentle-men as little acquainted with the
majority of his readers as with himself.' His abuse of
his fellow - candidates is dismissed with the remark,
that 'the regions of his ignorance and scurrility are
so extensive, that was the ocean converted into ink,
the sky into paper, and the stars into pens, it would
not be adequate to the task ' of exposing it. He ends
with�'A word or two by way of conclusion. It was the
common saying of an old philosopher to his son, "I
know what you have been doing, by knowing what company
you have been in." As Moorfields, St. Giles's, and
Hockley-in-the-Hole are such recent and familiar
phrases in the mouth of Mr. Noisy's advocate, it
requires no great skill in philosophy to learn at what
academies he received his education. Probatum est.'
In 1763, we have again Lord
Twankum, Kit Noisy, and the new candidate, Sir John
Crambo, who declares, 'I will not only use my best
endeavours to get repealed the late act on cyder and
perry, but also my strongest efforts that you shall
have strong beer again for threepence a quart.'
Seven candidates came forward
for the next election in 1768. These were Sir
Christopher Dashem, Lord Twankum,
Sir George Comefirst,
Sir William Airey, Sir William Bellows, one who signs
himself 'Batt from the Workhouse,' and Sir John
Harper. The latter was one James Anderson, a
breeches-maker of Wandsworth, who became one of the
most popular candidates during several elections.
This year's election was
formally commenced by the following announcement:
'Whereas divers persons have
thought proper to nominate themselves as candidates
for this most antient and loyal borough without
conforming to the several previous modes, forms, and
methods to be observed and taken before such
putting-up.
This is therefore to give
notice, that by antient records of the borough, each
and every candidate who enters the list of fame must
subscribe his name (either real or fictitious), his
place of residence (if he has one), and occupation
(if any), in the Doomsday-book of this borough, kept
at the Mansion House, lest any disqualified person
should dare to infringe, but the least atom, on the
privileges and immunities of this antient and most
loyal borough.
Mayor and keeper of the
Archives. 9th of April, 1768.'
In another broadside the same
mayor complains:
'That it hath been a custom
of late for several people, strangers and
foreigners, to erect booths for vending of beer and
other liquors on this occasion, who have neither
right, title, nor pretension to that privilege; and
that this custom is highly injurious to all the
publicans of Garrat, to whom solely that privilege
belongs by right of inheritance from time
immemorial.' He there-fore earnestly adjures the
public not to patronize them, and ends his harangue
thus: 'Now I must exhort you all to order and good
breeding; let the spirit of love reign amongst
you�yea, and the spirit of Englishmen. Then, and in
that there case, will the greatest decorum and
brightest example shine throughout your con-duct;
which shall be the fervent prayer of him who will
certainly suffer by the contrary, viz.,
Cross, Mayor. (His own
fist!)'
On this occasion Lady Twankum
played a conspicuous part with her lord. His bills
announce that 'Lady Twankum desires those ladies who
intend to honour her with their company to send their
servants for tickets.' In a second announcement, 'Lady
Twankum desires those ladies who are in the interest
of her lord to come full dressed, and clean about the
heels.' She also hopes they will honour her so far as
to drink chocolate, tea, coffee, or any other liquor
they please to order, on the morning of election;' and
adds, 'The lane and the whole borough will be grandly
illuminated, according to custom, during the ball.'
Lord Twankum concludes his
address by informing his constituents, 'The election
will be on the 7th of June ensuing; when I have given
strict orders that every house on the road between
Greenwich and Farnham shall be open from five o'clock
in the morning to nine, and from nine all day long;
where you may please, drink, amuse, and regale
yourselves at the mode-rate price of paying for what
you use. Also by water, boats, barges, lighters, and
wherries; and by land, proper vehicles, viz.,
sand-carts, dust-carts, dung-carts, carrion-carts,
trucks, and truckadoes, will be ready at the most
convenient places for you all�if you will only take
the trouble to seek them. and pay the hire.'
The election of 1775 is
announced by 'Richard Penn, Mayor, Deputy Ranger of
Wandsworth Common, and Superintendant of all the
Gravel-pits thereto belonging;' who recommends Sir
William Blaize and Sir Christopher Dashem, and
announces that two places of subscription are opened
in Wandsworth and four in London, at various public
houses, 'that the candidates shall not put themselves
to a shilling expense.' He deprecates bribery, and
notes a report 'as a caution to the worthy electors,
that Sir John Harper has engaged a certain famous
dancing Punch, who will exhibit during the whole
election.' Sir William Blaize announces himself as
'Nephew to the late Lord Twankum,' and that he 'went
as a volunteer from the artillery in the City of
London to St. James's, with 11,000 men to serve his
majesty in the rebellion in the year '45, under the
command of Sir William Bellows and Sir Joseph Hankey;
[he] has been fourteen years since in the Surrey
Militia, and exerted his abilities in such a manner
[as] has gained him the applause of his country in
general.'
The election of 1781 was as
remarkable as those of 1761 and 1768 for the number of
candidates; no less than nine contested the borough.
Among them were our old friends Sir John Harper, Sir
Christopher Dashwood, and Sir William Blaize; the new
candidates being a Sir John Gnawpost, Sir William
Swallowtail (one William Cook, a basketmaker, of
Brentford), Sir Thomas Nameless, Sir Thomas Tubbs (a
waterman), Sir Buggy Bates (one Robert Bates, a
waterman and chimney-sweep), and Sir Jeffrey Dunstan,
an itinerant dealer in old wigs, who turned out to be
one of the most popular of the candidates that ever
appeared on the Garrat hustings, and was retained
member for three successive parliaments. He came
forward in his own name with merely the prefix of a
title, was much of a humorist, and possessed a fund of
vulgar wit, and an extremely grotesque personal
appearance. He had been long known about London, from
his whimsical mode of crying his trade; and it was his
pride to appear hatless, and regardless of personal
grace, by wearing his shirt and waistcoat open to the
waist, his breeches unbuttoned at the knees, and his
stockings ungartered. He, however, assumed much mock
dignity, spite of his dwarfish size, disproportioned
head, and knock-knees; spoke of his daughters as 'Miss
Dinah' and 'beautiful Miss Nancy,' the latter being
elevated into 'Lady Ann' after she married ' Lord
Thompson,' a dustman of Bethnal Green, where Sir
Jeffrey resided until his death, by excess of drink,
about 1797. He was in the habit of rehearsing his
election speeches, and giving his imitations of
popular London cries, on stated occasions, at the
White-chapel public-houses, in company with 'Ray the
Tinker,' and 'Sir Charles Hartis,' a deformed fiddler
and an unsuccessful candidate for Garrat. His quaint
figure appears on some of the London tradesmen's
tokens, and was used as a sign to public-houses.
Sir John Harper, in his
address, speaks of having had the honour of serving
Garrat in the last two parliaments out-of-doors;'
calls himself ' principal rectifier of all mistakes
and blunders;' promises 'to promote the trade and
commerce of this land in general, and of every freeman
in particular of this ancient and loyal borough of
Garrat; to establish a firm, lasting, and universal
peace with America; chastise the insolence and
ingratitude of France, Spain, and Holland; and restore
this nation to its ancient glory.' He also promises to
call public servants to account in high places, to
lighten taxes, shorten parliaments, and bring forward
a scheme for the liquidation of the National Debt. He
at the same time solemnly declares that he 'will never
accept from government either place, pension, title,
contract, or emolument whatsoever.' Sir John Harper
and Sir Jeffrey Dunstan were unanimously returned,
though an imputation was cast on the latter, to the
effect that his daughter was to marry the son of the
Premier, Lord North. Other candidates had wicked
allegations levelled at them: Sir John Swallowtail was
declared to have a contract to supply government with
baskets; and Sir Buggy Bates another 'for a supply of
soot, for the powder to destroy vermin in biscuit.'
There are preserved three very
curious drawings by Valentine Green, delineating the
chief features of this great electioneering farce. The
most curious of the series represents Lady 'Maize in
her state barge passing through Wandsworth; the
principal inns, 'The Spread Eagle' and 'The Ram,' are
indicated, with the entrance to Garrat Lane. Her
ladyship carries in her boat a 'dancing Punch,'
similar to that noted in 1775. She has also two pages,
one to shield her beauties under a huge umbrella, the
other to ply an enormous fan. She was graphically
described to Hone by an old lady of Wandsworth.
'I remember her very well,' said she, 'and so I ought, for
I had a good hand in the dressing of her. I helped to put together many a good
pound of wool to make her hair up; I suppose it was more than three feet high,
at least; and as for her stays, I
also helped to make them, down in Anderson's barn. They were neither more nor
less than a washing-tub without the bottom, well covered, and bedizened
outside to look like a stomacher; as she sat in the boat she was one of the
drollest creatures for size and dress ever
seen!'
The boats were mounted on
wheels and drawn by horses, though in one instance we
see them dragged by men. The racket and
semi-masquerading of the populace is a notable
feature; many are habited in quaint wigs and hats, one
drummer is in female costume; women join the rowers,
quarrels and fights abound, and the scaffolding in
front of the 'Spread Eagle' falls with its occupants.
There is one remarkable spectator in the right-hand
corner of this scene�a coatless, loosely-dressed,
bald-headed man, with a porter-pot in his left hand;
this is the publican, Sam House, celebrated at all
Westminster elections for his zeal in the cause of
Fox. He was never seen to
wear either hat or coat, and
has been spiritedly depicted by the famed caricaturist Gillray.
Sir John Harper addresses his
constituents from a phaeton drawn by six horses, with
mounted postilions, and preceded by horsemen carrying
mops and brooms. Upon his
carriage is inscribed,
Harper for ever! No Whigs!' an allusion, possibly, to
Sir Jeffrey Dunstan. He is speaking opposite the inn
known as 'The Leathern Bottle,' which still stands
unchanged in Garrat Lane, nearly opposite the common,
which was the glory of the place. Sir William
Swallowtail came to the poll in a wicker-chariot made
by himself, and was preceded by hand-bell players. Sir
Christopher Dashwood was drawn in a boat, with drums
and fifes, and a Merry-Andrew mounted beside him. The
road was kept by ' the Garrat Cavalry,' consisting of
forty boys of all ages and sizes, so arranged that the
smallest boys rode the largest horses, and vice
versa''; who were commanded by a 'Master of the
Horse,' in caricature regimentals, with a sword seven
feet long, boots reaching to the hips, provided with
enormous spurs, and mounted on the largest dray-horse
that could be procured.
At the next election, in 1785,
the death of Sir John Harper left Sir Jeffrey Dunstan
without a rival; but in that for 1796 he was ousted by
a new candidate, Sir Harry Dimsdale, a muffin-seller
and dealer in tin-ware, almost as deformed as himself,
but by no means so great a humorist. The most was made
of his appearance, by dressing him in an
ill-proportioned tawdry court suit, with an enormous
cocked hat. He enjoyed his honour but a short time,
dying before the next general election; he was 'the
last' of the grotesque mayors, for no candidates
started after his death, the publicans did not as
before sub-scribe toward the expenses of the day, and
the great saturnalia died a natural death.
'None but those who have seen
a London mob on any great holiday,' says Sir Richard
Philips, 'can form a just idea of these elections. On
several occasions a hundred thousand persons, half of
them in carts, in hackney coaches, and on horse and
ass-back, covered the various roads from London, and
choked up all the approaches to the place of election.
At the two last elections, I was told that the road
within a mile of Wands-worth was so blocked up by
vehicles, that none could move backward or forward
during many hours; and that the candidates, dressed
like chimney-sweepers on May-day, or in the mock
fashion of the period, were brought up to the hustings
in the carriages of peers, drawn by six horses, the
owners themselves condescending to become their
drivers.'
After a lapse of thirty-four
years, when the whim and vulgarity of a Garrat
election was only remembered by a few, and recorded by
Foote's drama, the general election of 1826 seems to
have induced a desire to resuscitate the custom. A
placard was prepared to forward the interests of a
certain 'Sir John Paul Pry,' who was to come forward
with Sir Hugh Allsides (one Callendar, beadle of All
Saints' Church, Wandsworth), and Sir Robert Needall
(Robert Young, surveyor of roads), described as a
'friend to the ladies who attend Wandsworth Fair.' The
placard, which may be read in Hone's Every-Day Book,
displays 'a plentiful lack of wit.' The project of
revival failed; and Garrat has had no parliamentary
representative 'out-of-doors ' since the worthy
muffin-seller was gathered to his fathers at the close
of the last century.
CLIEFDEN HOUSE
On the night of the 20th of
May 1795, shortly after the family at Cliefden House
had retired to rest, a maid-servant of the
establishment, as she lay in bed, was reading a novel.
Absorbed in the story, she was perhaps supremely
happy. Bat she was suddenly roused from her enjoyment
by perceiving that her bed-curtains were in flames.
Too terrified to alarm the family, she sank down on
her bed and fainted.
While she lay helpless and
unconscious, the flames gathered strength, and spread
to other parts of the building. Happily, many of the
family were still awake, and in a few minutes the
whole household was in motion. Such, according to
tradition, was the origin of the conflagration.
Certain it is, that however it originated, the fire
occurred at the date mentioned, and calamitous were
its effects. Every life indeed was saved, but the
whole mansion, with the exception of its two end wings
and the terrace, perished in the flames, and nearly
all its rich furniture, its valuable paintings, and
beautiful tapestry, shared the same fate.
This house,
which had been originally designed by Archer for the
profligate
George
Villiers, second Duke of Buckingham,
was built of red brick, with stone dressings. At each
end was a square wing, connected with the main
building by a colonnade, and a magnificent terrace
about 440 feet long. The Duke of Buckingham, who
purchased Cliefden from the family of Manfeld, its
ancient proprietors, expended large sums, and evinced
much taste in its arrangement and decoration.
Regardless of expense, he procured the choicest
productions of our own and other countries, and
enriched this naturally lovely spot with a variety of
trees, shrubs, and flowers, scarcely to be met with,
at that period, in any other grounds of the same
extent. He also adorned it, according to the fashion
of the day, with alcoves and similar buildings.
Cliefden was his favourite
place of residence; and here he carried on his amours
with the infamous Countess of Shrewsbury,
whose
husband he killed in a duel.
Gallant and gay, in
Cliefden's proud alcove,
The bower of wanton Shrewsbury and love.'
His gallantries, however, were
often rudely curtailed by the want of money, and, from
the same cause, he was unable to complete the mansion
here; for, although the inheritor of immense property,
his lavish expenditure had involved him deeply in
debt, and he died in middle life, self-ruined in
health, in fortune, and in reputation.
After the death of the Duke of
Buckingham, Clifden was purchased by
Lord George
Hamilton (fifth son of the Duke of Hamilton), who for
his military services was created Earl of Orkney. At eonsiderable cost he
completed the house, and added
new beauties to the ground. He died in 1737, and
leaving no surviving male issue, his eldest daughter,
Anne, became Countess of Orkney, and succeeded to the
Cliefden estate. While in her possession, it was
rented by his Royal Highness Frederick Prince of
Wales, who for many years made it his summer
residence. This amiable prince, unlike his father, who
never appreciated the character of his British
subjects, or sought their true interest, exerted his
beat energies to acquire a knowledge of the British
laws and constitution, and to assimilate his own
tastes and feelings to those of the people he expected
to be called on to govern. In his general behaviour he
was courteous and considerate to all.
He was a zealous promoter of
every measure that he considered likely to forward the
public good, and a special patron of the arts,
sciences, and literature. Cliefden, as his residence,
became the resort of the literati of the day, among
whom Thomson and Mallet are still memorable in
connexion with it. Mallet first received the prince's
patronage, and was made his under-secretary, with a
salary of two hundred pounds a year. Thomson's
introduction to the prince, as described by Johnson,
is amusing. The author of the Castle of Indolence
appears to have been by no means diligent him-self.
His muse was a lazy jade, except under the sharp spur
of necessity; and Thomson, having received a
comfortable appointment under Government, indulged his
love of ease and good living, paying little or no
attention to his poetical mistress. But a change of
ministry threw him out of his lucrative post; his
finances were soon exhausted, and he lapsed into his
former indigence. While in this condition he was
introduced to the prince, and 'being gaily
interrogated,' says Johnson, 'about the state of his
affairs, he replied, they were in a more poetical
posture than formerly.' He was then allowed a pension
of one hundred pounds a year; but this being
inadequate to his now luxurious habits, he began again
to court his muse, and several dramatic productions
were the result. One of them was a masque entitled
Alfred, which he and Mallet in conjunction composed
for the Prinee of Wales, before whom it was performed
for the first time, in 1740, at Cliefden. One of the
songs in that masque was Rule Britannia. The masque is
forgotten; the author of the song, and they who first
heard its thrilling burst from the orchestra, are
mouldering in their tombs; the halls through which the
strain resounded have long since perished; but the
enthusiasm then awakened still vibrates in the British
heart to the sound of those words,
Rule Britannia, Britannia
rule the waves,
For Britons never, never shall be slaves!
Cliefden House, after the fire
in 1795, remained nearly as the flames left it till
1830, when it was rebuilt by Sir
George Warrender, who
had purchased the estate. After the death of Sir
George Warrender, Cliefden was purchased from his
trustees by the Duke of Sutherland; and within a few
months after his purchase was again burnt down, on the
15th of November, 1849, being the day of thanksgiving
for the cessation of the cholera.
In the summer of 1850, the
mansion was re-built by the Duke of Sutherland in a
still more magnificent style, from designs by Barry.
The centre portion, which is a revival of the design
for old Somerset House, now extends to the wings,
which, together with the terrace, are made to
harmonize with the new building. It is indeed a
magnificent and imposing structure, though by those
who prefer the more picturesque appearance of the
Tudor style, it may be considered heavy and formal. It
is now (1862) the residence of the Dowager Duchess of
Sutherland.
But the grounds of Cliefden,
which are about a hundred and thirty-six acres in
extent, are its chief attraction. They have often been
celebrated both in prose and verse. 'It is to Cliefden,'
says a modern writer, 'that the river here owes its
chief loveliness; and whether we view the valley of
the Thames from it, or float leisurely along the
stream, and regard it as the principal object, we
shall alike find enough to delight the eye and kindle
the imagination. Cliefden runs along the summit of a
lofty ridge which overhangs the river. The outline of
this ridge is broken in the most agreeable way, the
steep bank is clothed with luxuriant foliage, forming
a hanging wood of great beauty, or in parts bare, so
as to increase the gracefulness of the foliage by the
contrast; and the whole bank has run into easy flowing
curves at the bidding of the noble stream which washes
its base. A few islands deck this part of the river,
and occasionally little tongues of land run out into
it, or a tree overhangs it, helping to give vigour to
the foreground of the rich landscape. In the early
morning, when the sun has risen just high enough to
illumine the summit of the ridge and highest trees,
and all the lower part rests a heavy mass of shadow on
the sleeping river, the scene is one of extraordinary
grandeur.'
THE SALTPETRE MAN
It will perhaps surprise some
readers to learn that chemical science was so far
advanced in this country two hundred and twenty years
ago, that a patent was granted (dated 1625) to Sir
John Brook and Thomas Russel, for obtaining saltpetre,
for the manufacture of gunpowder, from animal exuviae,
from the soil of slaughter-houses and stables, and
even from the floors of dwelling-houses. But it
appears that the patent did not immediately produce a
supply equal to the demand; for in the year 1627, the
third of the reign of Charles I, a proclamation was
issued to remedy the inconvenience arising to the
service from the want of a full and proper supply of nitre for the gunpowder
manufactures. It first set
forth that the saltpetre makers were never able to
furnish the realm with a third part of the saltpetre
required, more especially in time of war; and then
proceeded to state that, since a patent had been
granted to Sir John Brook and Thomas Russel, for the
making of saltpetre by a new invention, they were
authorized to collect the animal fluids (which were
ordered by this same proclamation to be preserved by
families for this purpose) once in twenty-four hours,
from house to house, in summer, and once in
forty-eight hours in winter.
It will not require a very
fertile imagination to conceive that this proclamation
was offensive and highly inconvenient to the people,
and that the frequent visits of the Saltpetre Man and
his agents would be anything but welcome. This,
however, was not the worst. All soils throughout the
kingdom which were impregnated with animal matter were
claimed by the Crown for this peculiar purpose. And
the same proclamation empowered the saltpetre makers
to dig up the floors of all dove-houses, stables,
cellars, slaughter-houses, &c., for the purpose of
carrying away the earth; and prohibited the
proprietors from relaying such floors with anything
but 'mellow earth,' to afford greater facilities to
the diggers. An obvious consequence was, that
individuals anxious to preserve their premises from
injury by this ruinous digging, resorted to bribery,
and bought off the visits of the Saltpetre Man. He, on
the other hand, conscious of the power his privileges
gave him, became extortionate, and made his favours
more ruinous than his duties.
These vexatious and
mischievous visits were put a stop to in 1656, by the
passing of an act forbidding saltpetre makers from
digging in houses or enclosed lands without leave of
the owners. It also appears, from the extensive powers
of the act under which the above-named patent was
granted, that the corporate bodies of certain, or
perhaps all, municipal towns were compelled at their
own charge to maintain works for the manufacture of
saltpetre from the refuse of their respective
localities�a supposition which is confirmed by the
fact that, in the year 1633, an order was made by the
corporation of Nottingham, to the effect that no
person, without leave from the mayor and common
council, should remove any soil except to places
appointed for the reception of such matter; nor should
any such material be sold to any foreigner (stranger)
without their license. Four years later (1637) the
hall book of the same corporation contains the
following entry:�'William Burrows agreed to be made
burgess on condition of freeing the town from all
charges relating to the saltpetre works.' Doubtless
the corporation were glad enough to rid themselves of
the obnoxious character of the Saltpetre Man, with all
its disagreeable contingencies, when relief could be
had on such easy terms.
Troubles with the Saltpetre
Man can be traced to a still earlier date than any we
have mentioned, as the following curious memorial will
show.
'To the Righte Honorable
oure verse goode Lorde, the Lorde Burghley, Lorde
Hight Threasiror of Englande.
Righte Honorable, oure
humble dewties to your good lordshippe premised,
maye it please the same to be advertised, that at
the Quarter Sessions holden at Newarke, within this
countie of Nottingham, there was a general
complaynte made unto us by the whole countrie, that
one John Foxe, saltpetre maker, had charged the
whole countrie by his precepts for the caryinge of
cole from Selsona, in the countie of Notting-ham, to
the towne of Newarke, within the same countie, being
sixteen miles distant, for the making of saltpetre,
some towns with five cariages, and some with lesse,
or else to give him four shillings for eyrie loade,
whereof he bath receved a greate parte. Uppon which
complaynte we called the same John Ffoxe before some
of us at Newarke, at the sessions there, to answere
the premises, and also to make us a proposition what
lodes of toles would serve to make a thousand weight
of saltpetre, to the end we might have sette some
order for the preparing of the same; but the saide
Ffoxe will not sette down anie rate what would serve
for the making of a thousand. Therefore, we have
thoughte good to advise youre good lordshippe of the
premises, and have appoynted the clark of the peace
of this countie of Nottingham to attend your
lordshippe, to know your lordshippe's pleasure about
the same, who can further inform your good
lordshippe of the particularities thereof, if it
shall please your lordshippe to give him hearinge:
and so most humblie take our leaves. �Newark, the
8th of October, 1589.
Re. Markham.
William Sutton.
Rauf Barton.
Nihs. Roos.
Brian Lassels.
John Thornhagh.'
After the discovery and
importation of rough nitre from the East Indies, the
practice of obtaining it by such processes as those
described in the patent of Brook and Russel fell into
gradual disuse, and thus the country was relieved from
one of the greatest annoyances to which it had ever
been subject.
May 21st